And for once, it's non most The MVNHS© or CanuckCare©, but inward our ain Golden State:
"A California adult woman is defendant of posing every bit a chemist together with treatment out nearly a meg prescriptions earlier she was caught"
Turns out, she'd fraudulently claimed to attain got graduated from chemist's shop school, together with and thus "borrowed" the licenses of 2 other actual pharmacists alongside names similar to her own.
Yikes.
And Ms Le isn't the only 1 inward trouble:
"The [California Board of Pharmacy] is looking at revoking Walgreens’s chemist's shop license at the stores where Le worked. Walgreens couldn’t say the Board if they’d requested or reviewed Le’s chemist license together with couldn’t render her work application during the agency’s investigation."
Ooops.
Seems similar perhaps they should hold upwardly working on their work screening procedure (although 1 wonders if there's a fleck of a PC angle there, every bit well).
One wonders how much actual harm she mightiness attain got done, though: there's no cite inward the article of whatsoever pending civil litigation from her "patients."
Still my absolute favorite take-away is this:
"During questioning, Le told the Board “me together with my boy would hold upwardly really grateful if you lot could simply forget most this.”
I bet.
"A California adult woman is defendant of posing every bit a chemist together with treatment out nearly a meg prescriptions earlier she was caught"
Turns out, she'd fraudulently claimed to attain got graduated from chemist's shop school, together with and thus "borrowed" the licenses of 2 other actual pharmacists alongside names similar to her own.
Yikes.
And Ms Le isn't the only 1 inward trouble:
"The [California Board of Pharmacy] is looking at revoking Walgreens’s chemist's shop license at the stores where Le worked. Walgreens couldn’t say the Board if they’d requested or reviewed Le’s chemist license together with couldn’t render her work application during the agency’s investigation."
Ooops.
Seems similar perhaps they should hold upwardly working on their work screening procedure (although 1 wonders if there's a fleck of a PC angle there, every bit well).
One wonders how much actual harm she mightiness attain got done, though: there's no cite inward the article of whatsoever pending civil litigation from her "patients."
Still my absolute favorite take-away is this:
"During questioning, Le told the Board “me together with my boy would hold upwardly really grateful if you lot could simply forget most this.”
I bet.
Post a Comment
Post a Comment